Casa Marina Resort and Beach Club
May 7-9, 2007
Following successful special tracks on Case-Based Reasoning at FLAIRS over the past six years, we are inviting papers for the Seventh Special Track on CBR at the 20th International FLAIRS Conference. Case-Based Reasoning is an Artificial Intelligence problem solving and analysis methodology that retrieves and adapts previous experiences to fit new contexts. This forum is intended to gather AI researchers and practitioners with an interest in CBR to present and discuss developments in CBR theory and application.
Submissions are solicited on CBR topics, including but not limited to:
David W. Aha,
Naval Research Laboratory (
Esma Aimeur, Université de Montréal (Canada)
Klaus-Dieter Althoff,
Kevin Ashley, University of Pittsburgh (USA )
Stefanie Bruninghaus,
Robin Burke,
Bill
Cheetham, GE Research (
Sarah Jane Delaney, Dublin
Institute of Technology (
Kurt Fenstermacher,
Mehmet Göker, Center for Advanced
Research PricewaterhouseCoopers, (
Pedro González Calero,
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (
Luc Lamontagne,
Université Laval (Canada)
David B. Leake,
Hector Munoz-Avila,
Sascha Schmitt, SAP (
Robert
Simpson, IET Corp. (
Raja Sooriamurthi,
Ian Watson,
Nirmalie Wiratunga,
|
Naval Research Laboratory, Code 5515 |
Department of CS and Software Engineering |
Paper submissions due: 20 November 2006
Notification letters sent: 21 January 2007
Camera ready copy due: 11 February 2007
Track: (during conference exact date to be determined)
Interested authors must submit completed manuscripts by 20 November 2006. Submission guidelines can be obtained by referring to the conference website (http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~ddd/FLAIRS/flairs2007/). Papers will be refereed and those accepted for presentation will appear in the conference proceedings, which will be published by AAAI press.
Questions regarding the track should be addressed to David W. Aha or Luc Lamontagne.
Ashwin Ram, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Title: Case-based reasoning for Game AI
Abstract : Computer games are an increasingly popular application for Artificial Intelligence (AI) research, and conversely AI is an increasingly popular selling point for commercial games. Although games are typically associated with entertainment applications, there are many "serious" applications of gaming, including military, corporate, and advertising applications. There are also what the so called "humane" gaming applications—interactive tools for medical training, educational games, and games that reflect social consciousness or advocate for a cause. Game AI is the effort of taking computer games beyond scripted interactions, however complex, into the arena of truly interactive systems that are responsive, adaptive, and intelligent. Such systems learn about the player(s) during game play, adapt their own behaviors beyond the pre-programmed set provided by the game author, and interactively develop and provide a richer experience to the player(s).
In this talk, I will discuss a range of CBR approaches for Game AI. I will discuss differences and similarities between character-level AI (in embedded NPCs, for example) and game-level AI (in the drama manager or game director, for example). I will explain why the AI must reason at multiple levels, including reactive, tactical, strategic, rhetorical, and meta, and propose a CBR architecture that lets us design and coordinate real-time AIs operating asynchronously at all these levels. I will conclude with a brief discussion on the very idea of Game AI: is it feasible? realistic? and would we call it "intelligence" if we could implement all this stuff?
Michael Richter, University of Calgary, Canada.
Title: The foundations of similarity and utility
Abstract : In this paper we discuss a rigorous foundation of similarity reasoning on the concept of utility. If the utility is formulated in mathematical terms it can serve as a formal specification for a similarity system. However, utility can also be formulated in informal ways. We consider subjective versions, competing ones and those that change dynamically over time. These are illustrated be examples from risk analysis, speech recognition, and urban planning. From the examples we derive a number of challenges.